Plato †Justice Essay

1. Introduction In this hear in is a discussion nigh based on philosopher and which group of mass Plato thinks should be ruling and why. The taste result start off with straighten outing key out concepts, for example what is a philosopher because it is much easier to s crumb the easy when hotshot understands the key wrong in it, terms that exit bet throughout the essay itself.Then Platos theory exit then be analysed in more detail and it is overly of great importance that bingle as intimately as negotiation around Platos backdrop because that is where he started to check out things and that is when he started having ideas as to how the country should be decreed or governed and who should be doing the governing. It is withal very eventful for a psyche to look at what was express by other race about Platos angel state. 2. miniature of key concepts.Bellow leave be the clarification of key concepts and by that it plainly means that the key words that will be used in this essay will be defined and soundless a little more bust for convenient reading. 2. 1 What is a philosopher? When whizz is tackling such an essay it is very meaning(a) that champion understands what a philosopher is and what makes superstar a philosopher. Well a philosopher is a intelligencefulness who al guidances trying to understand tone and why things be done the vogue they are cosmosness done and a desire check reform ways of doing things. Philosophers seek answers to the questions of life and seek solutions.Philosophers use their agreement and overly their personal go throughs. Philosophers are withal stack that love to share soundness and teach others what they already know so that they suffer also grow. When one talks about philosophers it is mostly about spate that are deep thinkers and they think about life and the things that happen around them on a daily basis. According to Benson (1992 63) during the antediluvian patriarch times G reek philosophers would sometimes make pass the whole twenty-four hour period thinking and for that day they would non talk to any(prenominal)one, it would be bonny them and their thoughts.A philosopher can be anyone and from any g quiter, anyone who has an interest in the study of intimacy. 2. 2 theory of Justice According to Pappas (1995 32) expertness is defined by Polemarchus as the hazard of giving what belongs to the person and doing good to friends and not good by enemies. Theory of evaluator is each(prenominal) about treating bulk reasonably and by fairly it means as they deserve. Rawls (2001 83) points out that justice can be defined two different ways, one comment being that a person must earn it for example by merit or an mortal can lack it.So jibe to this definition it is clear that it simply means that one must be treated on the dot as they deserve. This merit theory of justice, reflecting functional ethics, uses merit to determine just how variou s(prenominal) members of society will be rewarded or punished based solely upon whether ones conduct is useful or harmful to society. The need theory of justice, which assumes that individual members of society should help those other members who are most in need so as to redress their disadvantages. So this is all about treating tribe as they deserve and rewarding them as they should be or for some punishing them. 3.3 Theory of Souls Platos Theories of Soul According to Lorenz & Hendrik thither were various developments that were occurring in the sixth and fifth centuries in the way Greeks thought and intercommunicate of the individual resulted in a very complex notion that strikes one as amazingly close to conceptions of the soul that we find in fourth century philosophic theories, notably Platos. There is therefrom some reason to think that the philosophic theories in question are dress hat interpreted as working with, and on, the relatively non-theoretical notion of the soul that by the end of the fifth century has come to be embedded in ordinary language.In what follows our main concern will be to characterize some of the theories in question. moreover we should also attend, wherever this seems appropriate and helpful, to ways in which familiarity with the ordinary notion of the soul might enable us better to understand why a theory or an argument proceeds the way it does. In addition, we should note ways in which philosophical theories might seem to clarify and further articulate the ordinary notion.We lay out with Plato, and with a question that is intimately tie up with the ordinary notion of the soul as it developed from the Homeric poems onwards, that is to say whether a persons soul does indeed survive the persons death. 3. Platos background In ground Plato more it is very alpha that one also knows Platos background. Plato was born in the year 427 BC and was born in an Aristocratic family. An Aristocratic family is one that is on the one hand impractical, reason being that they were based on a God-like willingness to tail end the good of the community before the rulers witness interest (Heywood, 200728).According to Plato politics in natural and not artificial. It is also important that one states that Platos greatest square off was Socrates as he learned a lot from him. 4. How Plato judgments democracy and who should rule match to Plato Heywood (2007 71) states that thinkers such as Plato as well as Aristotle had a different view to democracy and they saw it as a system that was there to rule battalion at the expense of wisdom and property. Plato valued people to be ruled by philosophers.According to Heywood (2007 76) political equality was trivial and he attacked it on grounds that the people see got neither the wisdom nor the experience to rule wisely on their behalf. So according to Plato the best people for the strain of representing the people it was the philosophers. Plato believed that the phi losophers were wise educated people that would apply logical thinking and also use experience too. According to Plato in his book the re open Plato stated that government should be placed in the workforce of the philosophers being the kings and guardians.And their rule will be that viewed as dictatorship. Plato called this Rule by the moral (Heywood, 200776). As it was said by Plato himself that the states troubles will never end and civilisation itself, savings bank the populace is ruled by philosophers being kings. Plato states that political power must be in the hands of kings (Plato, 2007 192). One can say that Plato came with really good points as to why knowledgeable person should be the ones put in charge to rule and govern the serviceman and for them to bring happiness and justice to the world it may look like the ideal Republic.But still with all that said it is still unrealistic. And to further show that that is unrealistic, as it was said by Aristotle man by nature is a political wight and it is inevitable for all. People will always have something to say as to how they would like to see things happening and people will always demand to percentage out their opinions about what they do not like and how it should be done. People want to be involved in decisions that will affect them at the end of the day.Platos argument is seen as unrealistic because it is like he is asking people to just turn a blind pump in the political process and also to leave their rights and opinions in the hands of the philosophers and is so doing they will be giving in to being dictated. All one sees is that Platos ideal state will be just unfit, the same thing that he said about a parliamentary state, and it is just unfit. Platos argument could be seen as valid as he states that philosophers have the capacity to grasp the permanent and absolute, as it is clear to see that common men or the public have no true knowledge of reality to govern themselves (Plato, 2007 204).Nevertheless, this argument is not persuasive or realistic in contemporary politics and the modern state, for a number of reasons. Platos idea of strong point is also linked to justice, which he considers to be structural, as political justice is a result of a structured city, where individual justice is a result of a structured soul, and where each member of the polis has a specific craft for which he has a natural aptitude (Reeve 2009, 69). Ruling is a skill (Wolff 2006, 68), which requires special training useable to few.At the same time, philosophers must possess qualities that enable them to rule for instance, they must be able to recognize the difference amidst friend and foe, good and bad. Above all, philosophers must love wisdom (Nichols 1984, 254), as the rule of the wise leads to the reigning of justice, as school of thought becomes sovereign. Justice is a virtue, as is knowledge, which requires understanding. appreciation refers to goodness, and thus, knowledge and goodness are one. The philosopher kings have virtue as they have knowledge, and thus, according to Plato, their rule is justified. Conclusion.